Race to the White House: The American Media’s Lack of Moral Discernment
Many on the GOP side of the aisle have been complaining that Mitt Romney seems to be incapable of hitting back against the constant stream of lies, innuendo, and calumny that Obama and his minions have unleashed thus far in this campaign. Romney's campaign has been a veritable demonstration of milquetoastiness by comparison. Yet the Old Media has the gall to claim that there is too much mud slinging going on by both sides.
This inability of the press to discern the tenor of the two campaigns proves two things clearly. First, that the media are ignorant of the concept of morality, certainly, but it also pretty much proves that they are sold out to Obama's reelection campaign.
Take Politico's recent piece in which they complain that "even the media's had enough" of the "disgrace" that this race has become.
The race for the White House has grown so toxic that it’s become a top topic among reporters and analysts covering the contest -- and some are even calling on President Barack Obama and presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney to call a truce.
Politico goes on to repeat complaints from such Old Media mavens as Brian Williams of NBC News, former Democrat operative and current NBC/MSNBC correspondent Chuck Todd, CNN's lefty shill Soledad O'Brien, and others, all of whom claim to be tired of the "ugly" campaign.
Well, we are all tired of the "ugliness" in this campaign, for sure. But the problem with these reports is that this ugliness is not coming from both sides. In fact, it has been predominantly from Obama, his super PACS, and his surrogates.
This act of moral equivalence – making out that Romney was being just as nasty as Obama – is proof that the Old Media is attempting to inoculate Obama for the exact sort of nasty, negative campaigning they are pretending to decry.
The fact is, Mitt Romney has run a pretty much straight down the line, issues-based campaign. Agree or disagree with his political points; he has avoided attacks on Obama's character, and his surrogates have not engaged in a back channel grudge match the way Obama's have.
Just think about what Obama has done, as Ben Shapiro notes:
- From Vice President Joe Biden: “They gonna put ya’ll back in chains.”
- From Mitt Romney: “Mr. President, take your campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago and let us get about rebuilding and reuniting America.”
- From Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt: Romney is “unhinged.”
- From Obama: Romney put a dog on the roof of his car.
- From Romney: Biden’s comments on coal, in which he said that coal caused more deaths than terrorism, showed his lack of vision for the country.
- The Obama campaign has called Romney a felon and a murderer.
And this is just a small sampling of the lies and personal attacks that Obama has perpetrated against Romney and now Paul Ryan.
In return, Romney has decried Obama's tactics, he's criticized Obama's campaign attacks, and he's expressed his desire to keep this race about the issues; but Obama has responded by a continuation of personal attacks, lies, and mud slinging.
Yet, Politico says both sides are doing the same thing.
This, I think, is an age old left-wing concept, though. It goes right along with the idiotic, left-wing policy of "zero tolerance" we see in schools -- that sort of policy where both participants in a fight are punished for the fight -- as if fights just spontaneously begin and no one is the instigator. It's as if the one who is defending himself is just as guilty as the one that picked the fight in the first place.
And that is what we see here. We see Obama cynically distracting voters with his campaign of mud slinging and lies and, when Romney defends himself, the Old Media tsk tsks Romney as somehow being just as bad as Obama. And what does this act of moral equivalence do? It mitigates Obama's culpability, makes of him a mere participant with everyone else instead of the instigator. In this way, the Old Media makes Obama nearly blameless when in reality he is the most guilty of all.
It's an act of moral equivalency that is, in the end, no morality at all.