Monday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell said that according to her sources, there is no “legal culpability” since there was “no intent” and that a motive would have to proved. “Honestly, from my sources, and they go pretty high up including — including some of the people who are doing the review for the — inside the intelligence community, I don’t think there is the legal culpability here. I don’t think there is going to be what has been widely reported. For a bunch of reasons. You have to prove intent, you have to prove motive. I mean, you’re a lawyer. I only play one on television. Scarborough, who prior to being a congressman practiced law in Florida, insisted that wasn’t true and questioned the defense Mitchell offered, which her sources had apparently laid out for her. Partial transcript as follows: SCARBOROUGH: You actually don’t. Whoever is telling you that — no, no, whoever is telling you that is not telling you what the statute actually says. MITCHELL: No, no, no The statute says — SCARBOROUGH: The statute also says that if you were reckless in the use of classified — use of information, then that also is an